Accessible Version of PDF: Fidelity Complaint Dkt 2015-0078_10-26-15
Document Shortcuts:
Stamped:
Not stamped
In the Matter of:
Docket No. E-2015-0078
Respondents:
FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES LLC,
Administrative Complaint
▲Top of page
I. Preliminary Statement
The Registration, Inspections, Compliance and Examinations Section of the Massachusetts Securities Division of the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth (the "RICE Section" and the "Division," respectively) files this Administrative Complaint (the "Complaint") to commence an adjudicatory proceeding against Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC ("Fidelity" or "Respondent") for violations of MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 110A, the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act (the "Act"), and 950 MASS. CODE REGS. 10.00-14.413 (the "Regulations"). The RICE Section alleges Fidelity acted in a dishonest and unethical manner and breached its obligation to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in the conduct of its business by
1) knowingly allowing unregistered investment advisers to utilize Fidelity's trading platform to conduct unregistered activity in Fidelity customer accounts, including the accounts of Massachusetts residents, and
2) facilitating the transfer of funds from Fidelity customer accounts to compensate unregistered investment advisers for providing investment advisory services.
The RICE Section seeks an order: 1) finding as fact the allegations set forth below; 2) censuring Respondent; 3) requiring Respondent to permanently cease and desist from further dishonest and unethical conduct that allowed unregistered investment advisers to utilize the Fidelity trading platform to conduct unregistered investment advisory activity in the Commonwealth and to be compensated from Fidelity customer accounts for providing unregistered investment advisory services; 4) requiring Respondent to engage an independent compliance consultant to review written policies and procedures regarding trading authorizations and ensuring that such policies include methods for enforcement and compliance oversight; 5) finding that all sanctions and remedies detailed herein are in the public interest and necessary for the protection of Massachusetts investors; 6) imposing an administrative fine on Respondent for each violation of the Act; and 7) taking any such further actions which may be necessary or appropriate in the public interest for the protection of Massachusetts investors.
Unregistered IA 1, a Massachusetts resident, is a prime example of Fidelity knowingly allowing unregistered investment advisory activity. Unregistered IA 1 began his unregistered advisory activity around January 2005 when two individuals submitted trading authorization forms to Fidelity allowing Unregistered IA 1 unlimited trading ability on their Fidelity customer accounts. Over approximately the next ten years, the trading authorizations submitted by twenty additional Fidelity customers repeatedly indicated Unregistered IA l's relationship to the Fidelity customer as the customer's "financial advisor," listing Unregistered IA 1 's employment as "self-employed" and his occupation as "financial advisor." Those forms, which were unambiguous and also permitted Fidelity to conduct background checks on Unregistered IA 1, were ignored by Fidelity as Unregistered IA 1 conducted his openly unregistered advisory activity. Unregistered IA 1 's unregistered activity was so blatant that on three separate occasions, twice in 2006 and once in 2014, Fidelity instructed him to register. Despite its demonstrated lmowledge of unregistered activity, Fidelity continued to allow Unregistered IA 1 to advise Fidelity customer accounts.
Over the approximate ten-year timeframe, seven Fidelity customers serviced by Unregistered IA 1 paid Unregistered IA 1 a total of $732,271.83 in advisory fees from their Fidelity customer accounts. The majority of these disbursements noted that the payment to Unregistered IA 1 was for advisory fees. Over that timeframe, Unregistered IA 1 made approximately 12,389 trades in his own Fidelity accounts and more than twice that amount, approximately 28,958 trades, in his clients' Fidelity accounts through his trading authorizations.
Fidelity valued Unregistered IA 1 's business because Unregistered IA 1 was an active trader, using Fidelity's active trader platform for his own accounts. Fidelity also highly valued Unregistered IA 1 's advisory business by allowing his clients, whose Fidelity customer accounts would not have qualified for the same platform on their own, to utilize Fidelity's active trader platform by virtue of their relationship with, and trading authorization given to, Unregistered IA 1. In addition to giving Unregistered IA 1 's clients access to cheaper commissions, Fidelity courted Unregistered IA 1 's continued use of its trading platform to generate trade revenue for Fidelity by providing Unregistered IA 1 with gifts such as free trades, airline miles and tickets to professional sporting event, despite disclaiming such items as gifts at the time they were given. Finally, after more than ten years of openly flaunting its regulatory requirements, Fidelity conducted a "risk assessment" for unregistered activity and revoked Unregistered IA 1 's trading authorizations on June 22, 2015.
▲Top of page
II. Summary
Investor protection is the responsibility of both the regulators and the regulated. Implicit with their obligations to protect investors, registered broker-dealers are required to act honestly and ethically. For at least ten years, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC ("Fidelity"), a registered broker-dealer, has knowingly allowed its retail customers to be advised by least thirteen unregistered Massachusetts investment advisors, serving as a haven from regulatory oversight by ignoring blatant unregistered investment advisory activity. As such, Fidelity breached its duty to act honestly and ethically and breached its obligations to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in the conduct of its business.
But for Fidelity allowing their trading platform to be utilized, unregistered investment advisers would have had no business. By allowing unregistered advisory activity, Fidelity put its own retail customers at risk and undeniably weakened the protections afforded to those retail customers through the Division's oversight of investment advisors who register with the Commonwealth. Fundamentally, registration is at the core of Fidelity's business and it is inexcusable that they would participate knowingly in unregistered activity.
Under the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act, MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. ll0A (the "Act"), persons located in Massachusetts who provide investment advice for a fee are required to register as investment advisers. Not only do investment advisers owe a fiduciary duty to their clients, but by requiring registration, the Act requires the investment adviser to open its books and records to inspection by the Division, and to comply with the Act and its corresponding Regulations at 950 MASS. CODE REGS. 10.00-14.413. The Act and Regulations prohibit investment advisers from providing services without a contract; exercising discretion without the proper financial requirements; charging performance fees to non-qualified clients, among other important safeguards intended to protect Massachusetts investors.
Unregistered IA 1, a Massachusetts resident, is a prime example of Fidelity knowingly allowing unregistered investment advisory activity. Unregistered IA 1 began his unregistered advisory activity around January 2005 when two individuals submitted trading authorization forms to Fidelity allowing Unregistered IA 1 unlimited trading ability on their Fidelity customer accounts. Over approximately the next ten years, the trading authorizations submitted by twenty additional Fidelity customers repeatedly indicated Unregistered IA l's relationship to the Fidelity customer as the customer's "financial advisor," listing Unregistered IA 1 's employment as "self-employed" and his occupation as "financial advisor." Those forms, which were unambiguous and also permitted Fidelity to conduct background checks on Unregistered IA 1, were ignored by Fidelity as Unregistered IA 1 conducted his openly unregistered advisory activity. Unregistered IA 1 's unregistered activity was so blatant that on three separate occasions, twice in 2006 and once in 2014, Fidelity instructed him to register. Despite its demonstrated lmowledge of unregistered activity, Fidelity continued to allow Unregistered IA 1 to advise Fidelity customer accounts.
Over the approximate ten-year timeframe, seven Fidelity customers serviced by Unregistered IA 1 paid Unregistered IA 1 a total of $732,271.83 in advisory fees from their Fidelity customer accounts. The majority of these disbursements noted that the payment to Unregistered IA 1 was for advisory fees. Over that timeframe, Unregistered IA 1 made approximately 12,389 trades in his own Fidelity accounts and more than twice that amount, approximately 28,958 trades, in his clients' Fidelity accounts through his trading authorizations.
Fidelity valued Unregistered IA 1 's business because Unregistered IA 1 was an active trader, using Fidelity's active trader platform for his own accounts. Fidelity also highly valued Unregistered IA 1 's advisory business by allowing his clients, whose Fidelity customer accounts would not have qualified for the same platform on their own, to utilize Fidelity's active trader platform by virtue of their relationship with, and trading authorization given to, Unregistered IA
1. In addition to giving Unregistered IA 1 's clients access to cheaper commissions, Fidelity courted Unregistered IA 1 's continued use of its trading platform to generate trade revenue for Fidelity by providing Unregistered IA 1 with gifts such as free trades, airline miles and tickets to professional sporting event, despite disclaiming such items as gifts at the time they were given. Finally, after more than ten years of openly flaunting its regulatory requirements, Fidelity conducted a "risk assessment" for unregistered activity and revoked Unregistered IA 1 's trading authorizations on June 22, 2015.
Unregistered IA 1 's example is emblematic of a systemic failure to detect and prevent unregistered activity. In July 2014, for the first time, Fidelity began assessing its internal risks of allowing umegistered investment adviser activity; an assessment which, upon information and belief, was expedited based on the Division's investigation. Fidelity's risk assessment identified ninety-three additional Massachusetts residents having fifteen or more trading authorizations over Fidelity customer accounts. Since January 1, 2015, thirteen Massachusetts unregistered advisers, including Unregistered IA 1, have had their trading authorizations revoked due to investment advisers' lack of registration with the Commonwealth. While Fidelity was concerned about its exposure to risk, at no time during the Division's investigation did Fidelity express concern about the risks to which it exposed its retail customer by allowing investment advisers to conduct umegistered activity. Fidelity's willful ignorance of and complete failure to detect and prevent unregistered activity has left Massachusetts individual investors, including Fidelity's own customers, at risk and constitutes a clear case of dishonest and unethical behavior.
▲Top of page
III. Jurisdiction and Authority
- As provided for by the Act, the Division has jurisdiction over matters relating to securities pursuant to chapter 110A of the Massachusetts General Laws.
- The RICE Section brings this action pursuant to the authority conferred upon the Division by Sections 204, 407A, and 414 of the Act, wherein the Division has the authority to conduct an adjudicatory proceeding to enforce the provisions of the Act and the Regulations.
- The RICE Section reserves the right to amend this Complaint and/or bring additional administrative complaints to reflect information developed during the current and ongoing investigation.
- Except as otherwise expressly stated, the conduct described herein occurred between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2015 (the "Relevant Time Period").
- Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC ("Fidelity") is a broker-dealer with its principal office located at 245 Summer Street, ZW9A, Boston, MA 02210 and a main address at 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917. Fidelity is assigned Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Central Registration Depository ("CRD") number 7784 and has been registered as a broker-dealer with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts since July 31, 1981.
- Unregistered IA 1 is a Massachusetts resident who, as of May 1, 2015 provided continuous and regularly supervisory or management services to nineteen client accounts totaling over $9,000,000 in assets. Unregistered IA l's application with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to register his sole proprietorship as an investment adviser, and himself as an investment adviser representative of that sole proprietorship have been pending since May 1, 2015. Unregistered IA 1 was last registered with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as a broker-dealer agent between July 20, 2000 and April 7, 2004.
- For over ten years Fidelity allowed unregistered investment advisers to utilize its trading platform to conduct investment advisory business.
- The unregistered investment advisers had their clients submit trading authorization forms to Fidelity in order to give trading access to their investment adviser. Fidelity then allowed the unregistered investment advisers to trade on the Fidelity customer account.
- Fidelity's standard trading authorization forms included a section requesting the nature of the relationship between the Fidelity customer and the authorized agent being given trading authorization. Many of these trading authorizations submitted to Fidelity clearly identified the unregistered investment advisers as having a financial adviser relationship with the Fidelity customer and often listed the unregistered investment advisers' employment as being "selfemployed" and their occupation as a "financial adviser."
- In response to a Division subpoena, Fidelity explained that it:
- permits account owners, of their own volition, to grant trading authorization to a
third party in their self-directed brokerage accounts. At the time the trading
authority is added by the customers, [Fidelity] does not analyze the relationship
between the account owner and the third party nor does [Fidelity] restrict the
customer as to whom they can grant trading authority (with the exceptions of
minors).
- According to Fidelity's 2005 written policies and procedures:
Trading authorization allows Fidelity to accept certain transaction orders from a third party on the customer's behalf or to provide account information for use in those transactions. The registered owner or fiduciary of an account can grant trading authority to a person who is not listed in the account registration.
- The same policies and procedures also provide the following regarding limited trading authority:
- Brokerage accounts: Allows a third party to place only buys, sells, respond to voluntary tender offers (BVOL), make SIMPLE allocation changes, or exchanges into new or existing positions on behalf of the customer.
- Mutual fund accounts: Allows a third party to place only exchanges into new or existing funds on behalf of the customer.
- Fidelity's policies dating back to at least 2005 indicate that Fidelity was aware that financial advisers were utilizing limited trading authorizations to conduct business in Fidelity customer accounts.
- Specifically, Fidelity's 2005 written policies and procedures state, in pertinent part:
Responding to requests from financial advisors
When a financial advisor calls to establish trading authorization on a brokerage or mutual fund account, you must send the Trading Authorization form directly to the account owner. All registered owners must sign the form and then have the financial advisor sign. Fidelity prefers that all authorized agents sign in the appropriate section, but we accept the signature of the firm's principal or president, signing in capacity..
!Important: The principal who signs the form must list the names of all agents authorized to act on the account.
- Despite maintaining that policy, Fidelity did not begin monitoring whether investment advisers with trading authority were registered with a federal or state regulatory agency as a matter of regular course until July 2014.
- In response to a Division subpoena, Fidelity explained that it:
determined that the risk associated with a third party who has trading authority over multiple accounts and who appears to be acting in an investment advisory capacity can be mitigated when the third party is registered with the SEC or at least one state and thus subject to their securities laws, regulations and oversight.
- The trading authorizations allow Fidelity to "obtain credit information, verify information [the authorized agent] provided, and perform a background check on [the authorized agent], and to reject or remove [the authorized agent] as authorized agent from this or any other account, at anytime and for any reason we see fit."
- Despite knowing of investment advisers' use of trading authorizations on Fidelity retail accounts and the authorized agent's express permission allowing Fidelity to conduct background checks, Fidelity facilitated umegistered investment activity in Fidelity customer accounts and on its trading platform.
- Furthermore, Fidelity processed payment of investment advisory fees from Fidelity customer accounts to umegistered investment advisers.
- In response to a Division subpoena, Fidelity explained that payments to umegistered
investment advisers with trading authorization on multiple accounts would create a red flag in
their systems once the number of affiliated accounts or trading authorizations reached fifteen.
Fidelity stated, in pertinent part:
...since November 2011, [Fidelity's Risk Management Team] has maintained a surveillance module which creates alerts for review when certain conditions are present. Specifically, the surveillance system generates an initial Trading Authority alert when a third party has trading authority over a certain number of accounts, and thereafter when red flags are triggered for the same item. The red flags are designed to alert the Firm when new conditions arise from an existing trade authority relationship, posing additional risk and warranting an updated review. The current red flags are as follows:
- Red Flag 7: the number of transactions (cash withdrawals) for the trader in a given account exceeded the threshold (currently 1)
- Despite Fidelity's surveillance module initiated in 2011, several Fidelity customer accounts had withdrawals payable to their umegistered investment adviser who had trading authority over their accounts. The earliest any of those umegistered investment advisers had their trading authority revoked, however was not until 2015.
- Unregistered IA 1, a Massachusetts resident operating a sole proprietorship, has never been registered with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as either an investment adviser or investment adviser representative.
- Over the course of approximately ten years, notes reflecting Fidelity's communications with Unregistered IA 1 demonstrate that Fidelity knew Unregistered IA 1 was managing money for a fee and instructed Unregistered IA 1 to register as an investment adviser on several occasions.
- Despite knowing that Unregistered IA 1 was unregistered, Fidelity allowed Unregistered IA 1 to provide investment advisory services in Fidelity customer accounts for over ten years.
- Unregistered IA 1 maintained some of his personal brokerage accounts at Fidelity and was an active trader. Fidelity's trade blotter for Unregistered IA 1 's accounts shows the following number of trades made from 2005 until July 24, 2015:
- Fidelity's notes reflecting an August 9, 2004 conversation with Unregistered IA 1 explain that Unregistered IA 1 was considering managing a friend's account and discussed his options with a Fidelity employee.
- One year later, Fidelity's notes from an August 24, 2005 conversation with Unregistered IA 1 state:
- Fidelity's notes from a January 2006 conversation show that Fidelity helped Unegistered IA 1 submit multiple trading authorization forms.
- In February 2006, Fidelity further noted that "[Unregistered IA 1] is going to have a number of accounts transferred to fidelity that he will manage - he asked if we could extend the gold commission schedule- offered to check and followup [sic]."
- A February 9, 2006 note memorialized a Fidelity employee's suggestion that Unegistered IA 1 register as an investment adviser::
- Fidelity's notes state that on February 13, 2006, a Fidelity employee told Unegistered IA 1 that Fidelity would "credit his account for 25 free trades as a way of saying thank you for all the referrals he has sent to [F]idelity. He has opened a lot of accounts with us and brought in a lot of trading account[s]."
- In addition to free trades, Fidelity's notes from March 2006 conversations with Unregistered IA 1 show that Fidelity also gave Unregistered IA 1 free airline miles for referring clients to Fidelity.
- Fidelity, however, expressed concerns that giving gifts to Unregistered IA 1 could raise regulatory concerns. A March 21, 2006 note regarding a Fidelity employee's communication with Unregistered IA 1 stated in part:
- In the same March 21, 2006 conversation , Fidelity again noted that Unregistered IA 1 was using his Fidelity private access accounts as an investment adviser and suggested that he register accordingly:
- Two days later, a Fidelity representative spoke with Unregistered IA 1, knowing that Unregistered IA 1 was acting as an investment adviser and noted:
- Notes from a conversation the next day explain that Unregistered IA 1 's conduct of advisory business on Fidelity's retail platform caused his personal trades to be executed ahead of his clients' trades. Specifically, the March 24, 2006 note states:
- Unregistered IA 1 encountered additional issues in managing his advisory accounts in May 2006, as reflected by Fidelity's notes:
- Fidelity notes from a January 26, 2009 with Unregistered IA 1 indicated that he was still acting as an investment adviser: "[c]alled to introduce myself. [Unregistered IA l ] is a money manager. He would like the clients he brings to Fidelity to be coded Private Client Group. No needs at this time."
- Similarly, on September 24, 2010, a Fidelity employee noted: "[ c ]alled out - [Unregistered IA 1] is an independent money manager - He uses Fido [Fidelity] platform for his clients -he has no needs at this time - i invited him to a 10/5 event and he declined."
- In 2012, two separate Fidelity notes indicate that Unregistered IA 1 continued to act as an investment adviser.
- In March 2012, a Fidelity employee noted: "REFERRAL ASKED-. Added 5 trades to a custorial [sic] account [ Unegistered IA 1] manages. The account had 5 free trades the customer never used. Asked customer if he was planning on managing new accounts and he said yes. He will call me when he is planning to do that."
- In September 2012 another Fidelity employee noted: "REFERRAL ASKED. Customer manages several accounts. will be bringing new customers and will give me a call. Granted 100 free trades for 6 months split between [ Unegistered IA l's] sep (70) and two account[s] he manages where funds were just deposited."
- In addition to free trades, January 2013 Fidelity notes from show that Unegistered IA 1 and a guest accepted Fidelity's invitation to attend a Boston Bruins National Hockey League game.
- An August 29, 2013 note shows that Unegistered IA 1 was still acting as an investment adviser and seeking free trades for referrals:
[Unegistered IA 1] called in because he had just referred a client to fidelity and wanted to know what offers we had for that. I advised him that we don't generally offer free trades for referred clients but as a ONE TIME courtesy we could offer him 25 free trades. I advised him not to expect free trades or anything when he refers clients. We do appreciate the business but don't offer anything for the referrals. He understood.
- Fidelity notes of communications with Unegistered IA 1 explained that when a trade commission rate was adjusted down (i.e. because Unegistered IA 1 could not trade online due to an error and placed the trade over the phone with a Fidelity employee), the adjustment was not to be considered a gift.
- Fidelity notes explicitly stating "non-gift" and "not a gift" began to appear in notes pertaining to conversations with Unegistered IA 1 around November 2013.
- In February 2014, knowing that Unegistered IA 1 was still conducting umegistered
investment advisory business on its retail platform, Fidelity again suggested that Unegistered IA
1 move his advisory client accounts to Fidelity's institutional platform for registered investment
advisers. Fidelity's notes state:
[Unegistered IA 1] had questions about setting up alerts for his accounts. He is managing many accounts, and wanted ot [sic] find ways to manage them more easily. I spoke to ECS. I let him know that the website was built for an individual, and that he should consider registering with Wealth Central, thought there will be more cost associated with that. He wanted to have someone call out to him. I will call IWS tomorrow to see if they can call him.
- Fidelity also later granted Unregistered IA 1 additional free trades for customer referrals despite its August 29, 2013 note indicating otherwise. Fidelity's April 24, 2014 notes explains: "[Unregistered IA 1] requested free trades for bringing in the new account. I added 10 free trades good for 6 months. Unregistered IA 1 is aware that the free trade promotion does not start until tomorrow and that any trades placed today will be at the standard commission."
- Three days later, on April 27, 2014, Fidelity noted that:
[Unregistered IA 1] called in asking about promotions we have available. He is managing client accounts and is waiting for trading authority to be added on a new client [account] in our system. He is interested in promotion for 140K new money to an IRA, discussed free trades and cash offer. client said the funds have already been transferred to the acct but he did not have a chance to add the promotion b/c he does not have authority on the account yet. discussed basic terms of promotions and let him know that generally the promotion need[s] to be signed up for ahead of time but the client could submit a request to see if they can get approval for an exception[.].
- Unregistered IA 1 continued to add additional advisory clients, as reflected by Fidelity's November 17, 2014 note regarding Unregistered IA 1: "client is setting up account with himself as limited trader. Actual account owner will be calling back tomorrow to my extension to credit the account for the 60 free trade[ s] offer. client self directed, uses limited trading authority on accounts for people he states are his clients."
- On March 20, 2015, a Fidelity note explained that Unregistered IA 1 added another client: "client just opened new account for $14000 asked about free trades. does not qualify for promotion but granted 10 free trades to account for setting it up."
- Finally, after continually knowing of and assisting Unregistered IA l 's unregistered investment adviser activity for over ten years, Fidelity decided to revoke Unregistered IA 1 's trading authorizations on Fidelity customer accounts.
- Fidelity's review and subsequent revocation of Unregistered IA 1 's trading authority was Fidelity was triggered by a January 12, 2015 trade authorization alert.
- In the January 12, 2015 trade authorization alert, Fidelity noted its reasoning for revoking Unregistered IA 1 's trading authority stating, "[t]rading authority has been terminated as he was acting in an advisory capacity, and is not registered."
- Fidelity, however, then allowed Unregistered IA 1 to continue to trade in Fidelity customer accounts for a few additional months after deciding to terminate Unregistered IA's trading authorizations.
- Fidelity informed Unregistered IA 1 of his trading authority termination in a letter dated April 22, 2015 which stated:
I am writing in reference to the Trading Authority that you have on accounts with [Fidelity].
We have made a business decision to remove your privileges as an authorized person on accounts held with Fidelity or any of its affiliates. This change is being done in accordance with the terms of our Customer Agreement and Trading Authority Agreement. We will be removing your access from all accounts on which you have trading authority on May 22, 2015. The owners will also be notified of the removal in writing on that date.
- After Unregistered I A 1 contacted Fidelity on April 27, 2015 , Fidelity agreed to work
with Unregistered IA 1 as he attempted to register:
Spoke with [Unregistered IA l ] . After consulting with Risk Management, I let the client know the following:
We are willing to work with the client as he goes through the process of becoming an RIA that is appropriately registered with FINRA. For now, we are keeping the 5/22/1 5 deadline to remove [Unregistered IA 1 ] as trade auth on all accounts. I have offered to follow-up with [Unregistered IA 1 ] between 5/1 5/ 15 and 5/20/1 5 to check on his progress of becoming an RIA. If the client is satisfactorily progressing toward becoming an RIA, Risk management may be willing to postpone removal of the trading authorization.
- On May 1, 2015, Unregistered IA 1 ' s sole proprietorship filed a Form ADV seeking investment adviser registration with the Division, and Unregistered IA 1 filed a Form U-4 seeking registration as an investment adviser representative of Unregistered IA 1's sole proprietorship in Massachusetts .
- Fidelity, however, did not revoke Unregistered I A 1 ' s trading authority on May 22, 2015 , as it stated it would in its April 22, 2015 letter to Unregistered IA. Instead, Fidelity did not revoke Unregistered IA 1's trading authority not doing so until approximately June 22, 2015 .
- Fidelity never informed the Division that Unregistered IA 1 had conducted unregistered investment advisory activity using Fidelity ' s platform for approximately ten years .
- Over those ten years, Fidelity allowed approximately twenty-two Fidelity customers to add Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on their Fidelity accounts, and allowed Unregistered IA 1 to transact thousands of trades in the Fidelity customers' accounts.
- In addition, over that same timeframe, Fidelity processed approximately $732,27 1 . 83 in payments to Unregistered IA 1 from seven Fidelity customers to compensate Unregistered IA 1 for his unregistered investment advisory services.
- In its July 9, 2015 subpoena response, Fidelity explained that it began to look at the "risk associated with a third party who has trading authority of multiple accounts and who appears to be acting in an investment advisory capacity" in July 2014.
- Fidelity further explained in its subpoena response that: "for the past 1 2 months [July 2014-July 2015] , as a matter of regular course, Risk has been gathering information, made publically available via FINRA broker-check and the SEC website as to whether the third party is registered."
- When asked b y the Division in a June 26, 2015 subpoena to discuss Fidelity's registration
analysis, both generally and with regard to Unregistered IA 1, Fidelity stated:
As described in Interrogatory No. 1, [Fidelity's] Risk [Management Division] reviews business escalations and Trade Authority risk alerts related to third parties who have trading authority on customers ' self-directed brokerage accounts. When reviewing the escalation or alert, if it appears the third party is acting in an investment advisory capacity, Risk will search FINRA broker-check and/or the SEC website to ascertain if the third party is registered for the reasons noted in Interrogatory No. 1 . Further stated, the firm does not perform an analysis to determine whether or not the third party is required to be registered pursuant to the intricate laws, regulations, and exemptions which vary state by state. To perform such an analysis is not within the purview of the Firm nor are we aware of any requirement to do so.
With regard to the review of [Unregistered IA 1 ] , Risk searched FINRA brokercheck and the Sec website and did not find that Unregistered IA 1 was registered. Please note, the Firm did not perform a registration analysis to determine whether or not Mr. Unregistered IA 1 is required to be registered with the SEC or any state.
- Fidelity ' s risk alert procedures state:
We will terminate (remove the [Trading Authority] from accounts) if in our review we determine: a) The Trading Authority appears to be conducting advisory business (holding themselves out publically or giving us, or clients the impression of such a business) but is not registered with the SEC or at least one state.
- In January 2005, Client 1 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l's relationship with Client 1 as a "friend/adviser."
- In August 2005, Client 1 executed another trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on three additional accounts.1 The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l's relationship with Client 1 as a "financial adviser," and listed Unregistered IA l's employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made Fidelity customer accounts in which Client 1 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2005:
- In 2012 and 2013, Client 1 executed two additional trading authorization forms that also identified Unregistered IA l's relationship with Client 1 as a "financial adviser," and listedUnregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor" in the trading authorization form's authorized agent section.
- Fidelity's trade blotter reflects that 1 75 trades were made over 2013 and 2014 for one of Client 1 's two additional accounts advised by Unregistered IA 1 .
- Over the course of ten years, Client 1 paid Unregistered IA 1 approximately $1 70,032 in advisory fees from her Fidelity accounts .
- In January 2005 , Client 2 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on his Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form ' s authorized agent section was signed b y Unregistered I A 1 and identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 2 as a "financial advisor" and listed Unregistered IA 1's employment as a "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in Fidelity customer accounts in which Client 2 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 200s5 :
- In 2013 , Client 2 executed an additional trading authorization form that also identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship to Client 2 as a "financial advisor," and listed Unregistered IA 1' s employment as "self-employed," and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter reflects that 73 trades were made between 2013 and 2015 in one of Client 2's additional accounts advised by Unregistered IA 1.
- Over the course of 2 0 1 4 and 2015, Client 2 paid Unregistered IA 1 approximately $1 30,566 in advisory fees from one of his Fidelity customer accounts.
- In March 2006, Client 3 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on three Fidelity customer accounts. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and did not identify Unregistered IA 1's relationship with Client 3 , but did list Unregistered IA 1's employment as "self-employed" and his occupation as "investing."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in Fidelity customer accounts in which Client 3 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2006:
- In 2007, Client 3 paid Unregistered IA 1 $256.39 in advisory fees from her Fidelity account.
- In March 2006, Client 4 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA 1's relationship with Client 4 as a "financial advisor", but did not identify Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment o r occupation.
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in Fidelity customer accounts in which Client 4 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2006:
- Between 2006 through 2007 and 2010 through 2015, Client 4 paid Unregistered IA 1 approximately $131,241.58 in advisory fees from her Fidelity customer account.
- In March 2006, Client 5 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form' s authorized agent section was signed b y Unregistered I A 1 and identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 5 as a "financial advisor," and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in Fidelity customer accounts in which Client 5 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2006:
- In June 2006, Client 6 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on three Fidelity customer accounts. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA 1's relationship with Client 6 as a "financial advisor," and listed Unregistered IA 1's employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in Fidelity customer accounts in which Client 6 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2006 :
- Over the course of 2014 and 2015 , Client 6 paid Unregistered IA 1 approximately $35,756.60 in advisory fees from her Fidelity customer account.
- In August 2006, Client 7 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form' s authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA 1's relationship with Client 7 as a "financial advisor," and listed Unregistered IA 1's employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor/manager. "
- In November 2014, Client 7 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on another one of her Fidelity customer accounts.
- The November 2014 trading authorization form' s authorized agent section, which was also signed by Unregistered IA 1, also identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 7 as a "financial advisor" and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in Fidelity customer accounts in which Client 7 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2006 and 2014:
- In July 20 10, Client 8 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form' s authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 8 as an "investment adviser," and listed Unregistered IA l ' s employment as "self-employed" and his occupation blank.
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 8 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in in 2010:
- In December 2010, Client 9 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on his Fidelity customer account. The authorized agent section, signed by Unregistered IA 1, identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 9 as an "investment adviser," and listed Unregistered IA l ' s employment as "self-employed," but did not identify Unregistered IA l ' s occupation.
- Fidelity ' s trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 9 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2010:
- In August 2011, Client 1 0 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 1 0 as a "financial adviser," and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "self-employed" and his occupation as a "financial consultant. "
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made i n the Fidelity customer account in which Client 1 0 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2011:
- In August 2013 , Client 1 1 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on his Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form' s authorized agent section was signed b y Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 1 1 as a "financial advisor," and listed Unregistered IA l ' s employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 1 1 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2013:
- In August 2013 , Client 12 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form' s authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 12 as a "financial adviser," and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- In March 2014, Client 12 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on another one of her Fidelity customer accounts. That trading authorization forms' authorized agent section, which was also signed by Unregistered IA 1, identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 12 as a "financial advisor," and listed Unregistered IA l ' s employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in Fidelity customer accounts in which Client 12 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2013 and 2014:
- In January 2006, Client 1 3 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on his Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 13 as a "financial adviser," and listed Unregistered IA l ' s employment as "self' and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- In December 2013, Client 1 3 executed another trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on an additional Fidelity customer account. That trading authorization form' s authorized agent section, which was also signed by Unregistered IA 1, identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 1 3 as a "financial adviser," and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in Fidelity customer accounts in which Client 13 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2013:
- Between 2006 through 2007 and 2010 through 2015 Client 1 3 paid Unregistered IA 1 approximately $256, 1 09.27 in advisory fees from his Fidelity customer account.
- In January 2014, Client 1 4 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on his Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 1 4 as a "financial adviser," but did not identify Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment and occupation.
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 1 4 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2014 :
- In January 2014, Client 15 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on his Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 15 as a "financial adviser," and identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment a s "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 15 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2014 :
- Over the course of 2014 and 2015, Client 15 paid Unregistered IA 1 approximately $8,309.16 in advisory fees from his Fidelity customer account.
- In April 2014, Client 16 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form' s authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 16 as a "financial adviser," and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "self-employed" but did not identify Unregistered IA 1 ' s occupation.
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 16 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2014:
- In April 2014, Client 17 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form' s authorized agent section was signed b y Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 17 as an "advisor," but identified Client 17 ' s employment and occupation rather than Unregistered IA 1 's employment and occupation.
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 17 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 20144 :
- In April 2014, Client 18 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 18 as a "financial advisor," and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity ' s trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made i n the Fidelity customer account in which Client 18 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2014:
- In November 2014, Client 1 9 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form' s authorized agent section was signed b y Unregistered I A 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 1 9 as a "friend," and listed Unregistered IA l ' s employment as "selfemployed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 1 9 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2014 :
- In December 2014, Client 20 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed b y Unregistered I A 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 20 as a "financial advisor," and listed Unregistered IA l ' s employment as "self-employed" and occupation as a "financial advisor."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies the following number of trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 20 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2014 :
- In March 20 1 5, Client 21 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on her Fidelity customer account. The trading authorization form' s authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA 1 ' s relationship with Client 2 1 as a "financial advisor," and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "employed" and occupation as a ''financial consultant."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies fifty-seven trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 2 1 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2015 .
- In March 20 1 5, Client 22 executed a trading authorization form adding Unregistered IA 1 as an authorized agent on two Fidelity customer accounts. The trading authorization form's authorized agent section was signed by Unregistered IA 1 and identified Unregistered IA l ' s relationship with Client 22 as a "CFA," and listed Unregistered IA 1 ' s employment as "selfemployed" and occupation as a "CFA."
- Fidelity's trade blotter identifies 119 trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 22 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2015 .
- In response to the Division' s July 1 6, 2015 request that Fidelity identify individuals whose trading authorizations had been terminated between July 1 6, 2 0 1 0 and July 1 6, 2015 due to a lack of registration, Fidelity identified five additional Massachusetts residents (i.e. not including Unregistered IA 1 ) whose trading authorities were revoked during between January 20, 2015 and June 8, 2015 .
- Furthermore, i n response to the Division' s August 26, 2015 request, Fidelity identified an additional seven Massachusetts residents who had been informed by Fidelity that his or her trading authorization would be revoked. The seven individuals' trading authorities were revoked between July 27, 2015 and September 17, 2015 .
- Cumulatively, the revocations of these twelve individuals ' trading authorizations due to a lack of registration were only effected in 20 1 5, with the maj ority of those revocations occurring after the Division' s June 26, 2015 subpoena requesting information on such non-registered individuals. Specifically, Fidelity provided the following information on those twelve Massachusetts residents : 2
- Unregistered IA 2 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- Fidelity's notes of interactions with Unregistered IA 2 s that he had investment advisory clients in March 2013.
- Notes of Fidelity's registration analysis of Unregistered IA 2 state that Unregistered IA was "getting paid from [Fidelity customer] for investment mgmt and is not registered. Located checks that show him getting paid."
- Fidelity's notes from January 20, 2015 indicate that Unregistered IA 2's trading
authorization would be revoked:
In accordance with the terms of the Trading Authority Agreement, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Fidelity has elected to remove the privileges of [Unregistered IA 2] as authorized agents on all accounts held with Fidelity. A letter was sent to all clients that [Unregistered IA 2] has authority explaining this decision and that immediately; [Unregistered IA 2] will be removed as Trading Authority on all of their Fidelity accounts. Risk Management DOES not speak directly with customers. DO NOT transfer or give the customer our phone number.
- Unregistered IA 3 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period. However, prior to the Division learning of Unregistered 3's unregistered activity, unregistered IA 3 did register with the Division as a solicitor for a state-registered investment adviser.
- In April 2010, Unregistered IA 3 informed Fidelity that between his accounts and family accounts, they had around $3,000,000 in assets with Fidelity.
- In July 2012, Fidelity assisted Unregistered IA 3 with electronic delivery of statements for the accounts in which he had trading authorization.
- In December 2012, Fidelity notes reflect that Unregistered IA 3 confirmed that he could trade in a client's account but that he needed full trading authority in order to facilitate a distribution.
- Notes of Fidelity's registration analysis of Unregistered IA 3 state that Unregistered IA 3 was "[s]elf employeed [sic] as investor. Listed at advisor acct ... Linkedin lists line of work as Financial Services - connected to other financial advisors[.]"
- Fidelity's notes from March 31, 2015 indicate that Unregistered IA 3 's trading
authorization would be revoked:
In accordance with the terms of the Trading Authority Agreement, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Fidelity has elected to remove the privileges [Unregistered IA 3 ] as authorized agent on all accounts held with Fidelity. A letter was sent to him regarding this decision. A letter will also be sent on April 17, 2015 to all clients in which [Unregistered IA 3 ] was named an authorized party. ; [Unregistered IA 3 ] will be removed on April 17, 2015 as Trading Authority on all of their Fidelity accounts. Risk Management DOES not speak directly with customers . DO NOT transfer or give the customer our phone number
- Unregistered IA 4 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- Fidelity ' s notes of interactions with Unregistered IA 4 indicate that she had trading authority on Fidelity customer accounts since April 2013 , if not earlier.
- Notes of Fidelity's registration analysis of Unregistered IA 4 state:
[Trading authority] forms list client as Advisor for [Unregistered IA 4 ' s company] , however, unable for find registration. No bankruptcy, liens, judgments, or criminal record. Former Fidelity employee. . . . 2/2 1 /14 notes, "spoke with [Fidelity customer] - she is ok for now . . . she has a financial advisor that she has utilized for 15 years whom she feels comfortable with. . .t he advisor used to work at Fidelity" . . . 5/20/ 1 1 notes, "they have a financial advisor that they work with and I explianed [sic] that we work along side advisors to help implement any plans. " . . . 9/20/12 notes, "he has an outside advisor that has been bugging him to consolidate. informed we have local advisors that can help at no cost. he appreciated the offer"
- Fidelity's notes from June 3 , 2015 indicate that Unregistered IA 4 ' s trading authorization
would be revoked:
In accordance with the terms of the Trading Authority Agreement, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Fidelity has elected to remove the privileges of [Unregistered IA 4] as authorized agent on all accounts held with Fidelity. A letter was sent to her regarding this decision. A letter will also be sent on June 23, 2015 to all clients in which [Unregistered IA 4] was named an authorized party. ; [Unregistered IA 4] will be removed on June 23, 2015 as Trading Authority on all of their Fidelity accounts. Risk Management DOES not speak directly with customers. DO NOT transfer or give the customer our phone number.
- Unregistered IA 5 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- Fidelity's April 2 1, 2007 notes of conversations with Unregistered I A 5 show that he was an investment adviser: "customer works as an advisor and manages appx 9 million dollars held at [F]idelity. . . . "
- Over five years later, on October 1 9, 20 1 2, Fidelity noted that Unregistered IA 5 was still advising accounts: " [Unregistered IA 5] called to inquire about managed acct services. He helps family and friends with several accounts totaling over[] $8 mil."
- Later that same day, a Fidelity branch employee spoke with Unregistered IA 5 , noting in part: "introduction call to client. He wants to come in to meet in a few weeks to discuss his options for having Fidelity assist him in the management of his accounts. He oversees a lot of family and friend accounts"
- On May 18, 2014, Fidelity's notes again acknowledge their recognition of
Unregistered IA 5 as an advisor, stating:
q's abt setting up a promotion for a new account that is bringing over for a new client. I informed the client he only has inquiry access and he will have to call with the new account owner. I informed him he has to call with the client owner. He is an advisor and I asked him have he ever talk with our advisor group group to look at the platform and he is talking with somone [sic] at the local branch.
- Notes of Fidelity's registration analysis of Unregistered IA 5 state :
[Unregistered IA 5 ] is listed as retired in BNAM, notes show he was an operations manager. I find no licensing in FINRA, now or ever. Accurint has no adverse information. 1st account reviewed is for [Fidelity customer/account number]. Her trade auth forms list him as "advisor" I find quarterly checks paid to [Unregistered IA 5], no memo notes. IRF dates 4/28/15 $7364, 2/18/15 $5618, 10/24/14 $5814, 7/25/14 $5502, 5/6/14 $536 1, 1/22/14 $5318 . . . [Fidelity system] notes 4/21/15 " spoke to [Fidelity customer] and let her know about [Fidelity employee's] departure. She said the [sic] has an outside advisor that she works with and doesn't need anyone at fid. "2/3/15" I asked the client about her investments. Client has an outside adviser that she is happy with. I advised her of her AE. "
- Fidelity's notes from June 3, 2015 indicate that Unregistered IAS's trading authority
would be revoked:
In accordance with the terms of the Trading Authority Agreement, Fidelity Brokerage S ervices LLC, Fidelity has elected to remove the privileges of [Unregistered IA 5] as authorized agent on all accounts held with Fidelity. A letter was sent to him regarding this decision. A letter will also be sent on June 23, 2015 to all clients in which [Unregistered IA 5 ] was named an authorized party. ; [Unregistered IA 5] will be removed on June 23, 2015 as Trading Authority on all of their Fidelity accounts . Risk Management DOES not speak directly with customers . D O NOT transfer or give the customer our phone number.
- Unregistered IA 6 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- Fidelity' s May 1 3 , 2010 notes indicated that Unregistered IA 6 could only have limited
trading authority on an account and not a power of attorney because Unregistered IA 6 was not a
registered investment adviser, stating:
[Unregistered IA 6] called to stated he has the permanent appointment of his wife as executor for her fathers acct. he will bring it by the branch today. he wants to be appointed POA on acct. per new accts we can not accept POA and can only have limited trading auth if he is an RIA.
- Fidelity' s notes reflect that i n 2013 it assisted Unregistered IA 6 with both adding and removing limited trading authorizations in Fidelity customer accounts.
- On December 4, 2013 , Fidelity noted that it would research how Unregistered IA 6 could
get more access to client accounts :
- Would like to have more access to oversight. Currently clients share their
passwords with him but would like oversight on technical issues like stopping
checks. researching what level of access granting needed for that. []Going on a
week long bus trip north to see 15 clients[.]
- Fidelity' s notes of its registration analysis of Unregistered IA 6 state:
[Unregistered IA 6] is trade auth on 27 accounts. He is not licensed in FINRA. . His BNAM AFF info says he is retired on one of his accounts and the other says his occupation is financial management and he is self[]employed. Trade auth forms indicate the relationship is "professional" and he lists his profession on those forms as financial planner or financial consultant. every account has a note from an Ex AE and a branch manager. . . "Permission to decode based on previous approval. This client was one of about 15 or so that has mgmt done by [Unregistered IA 6] . He uses the branch for service only. When the AE left, the clients that were spread out all over the country got sent to the right location branch. We got them back here. But then [Unregistered IA 6] and I spoke (see his [Fidelity system]) and agreed that we would remove AE and he would just use all of us for service. " I spoke to branch manager [Fidelity employee] at Vero Beach. He confirmed my thoghts [sic] ... he believes that [Unregistered IA 6] is getting paid and is advising, that why they severed the AE relationship. he uses us only for service now. Client [Last name] ([account number]) shows checks paid to [Unregistered IA 6] . check 1 076 on 2/1 7/ 15 for $79.50. check 1 068 on 1 1/24/14 for $4568.65, (both of those have nothing in the memo field) check 1 044 o n 3/8/11 for $2425 has "tax preparation in the memo field) Client [last name] ([account number]) has check 1311 on 5/14/14 for $2000, memo says "professional services 2013 -2014" same account has a letter written to [Unregistered IA 6] from [Fidelity customer] talking about some dividend paying stocks they might want to consider. client sent this to us??? (4/29/ 1 4) Client [last name] in account has a check 105 1 on 1 /20/12 for $3300 memo says " services" nothing advers[e] in Accurint[.]
- Fidelity notes from June 10, 2015 reflect that Fidelity had terminated Unregistered IA 6 ' s trading authority: "Client was removed as FTA/LTA on several accounts as per Risk. Passed along that info. . . no other info at this time. Told him he would however be reinstated on his wife's BDA."
- Furthermore, Fidelity ' s June 23, 2015 notes state:
Spoke with [Unregistered IA 6] about his removal from trading authorization from roughly 20 accounts, explained some of the context: advisors and licensure and our customer agreement.
He was not upset with that but was upset about how it was communicated
...
He remained pleased with me and our branch. He is unsure what he will do with his accounts. And the other clients that have reached out to him are a bit confused too
- Several days later, Fidelity' s notes pertaining to Unregistered IA 6 ' s revocation of trading
authorizations state :
I was calling her after I spoke with her former FTA agent, [Unregistered IA 6] , he is a well known client. He was removed from the account because he lacks FINRA licensure. It was part of a proj ect across the nation, not just targeting [Unregistered IA 6] .
Fidelity phone agents have been making it sound to his former clients that it was about him. According to the RISK director who led the project, this is simply not true. Instead it twas Fidelity not wanting exposure under our Cust[omer] Agreement and Trading Authorization form for non-licensed advisors.
As further evidence, [Unregistered IA 6] remains trustee on several accounts. So it was the Trading Authorization situation not a [Unregistered IA 6] situation. He has been calm and patient so far but he said if his reputation continues to be insulted, he would have no choice but to ake [sic] action.
- Unregistered IA 7 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- Fidelity' s July 3 1, 2015 notes reflect that Unregistered IA 7 ' s trading authority would be
revoked:
In accordance with the terms of the Trading Authority Agreement, Fidelity Brokerage S ervices LLC, Fidelity has elected to remove the privileges of [Unregistered IA 7] as authorized agent on all accounts held with Fidelity. A letter was sent to him regarding this decision. A letter will also be sent on August 3 1, 2015 to all clients in which [Unregistered IA 7] was named an authorized party. ; [Unregistered IA 7] will be removed on August 3 1, 2015 as Trading Authority on all of their Fidelity accounts. Risk Management DOES not speak directly with customers . DO NOT transfer or give the customer our phone number.
- Unregistered IA 8 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- Fidelity' s July 3 1, 2015 notes reflect that Unregistered IA 8 ' s trading authority would be
revoked:
In accordance with the terms of the Trading Authority Agreement, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Fidelity has elected to remove the privileges of [Unregistered IA 8] as authorized agent on all accounts held with Fidelity. A letter was sent to him regarding this decision. A letter will also be sent on September 1, 2015 to all clients in which [Unregistered IA 8] was named an authorized party. ; [Unregistered IA 8] will be removed on September 1, 2015 as Trading Authority on all of their Fidelity accounts. Risk Management DOES not speak directly with customers. DO NOT transfer or give the customer our phone number.
- Unregistered IA 9 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- Fidelity's January 3 , 20 1 2 notes demonstrate that Fidelity instructed Unregistered I A 9 as to how to organize her client accounts on Fidelity's electronic platform stating: "client manages multiple accounts with us and would like a way for her to organize her account list on fidelity.com position's page."
- Two years later, Fidelity notes o n February 1 9, 2014 that Unregistered IA 9 1s an
investment adviser:
I am a retired investment advisor who services a few clients. I have had them open accounts at Fidelity so that I can handle their assets along with my own. I find, though, that when I access their accounts through my personal log-in, I cannot see their statements or any history older than 30 days. Why is this?-- NOTE( l ) : provided link to duplicate statement form
- On May 29, 2014, Fidelity' s note reflect that it advised against Unregistered IA 9 using
her clients' Fidelity log-in and passwords to access their accounts:
[Unregistered IA 9] called in to troubleshoot safari login. Client on call mentioned she is an advisor and uses all her client[']s logins. I explained to her this should not be done and offe rred [sic] options for more transparency for her login. Client not interested
- Fidelity' s September 14, 2015 notes indicate that Unregistered IA 9 ' s trading authority
would be revoked:
In accordance with the terms of the Trading Authority Agreement, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Fidelity has elected to remove the privileges of [Unregistered IA 9] as authorized agent on all accounts held with Fidelity. A letter was sent to her regarding this decision. A letter will also be sent on October 14, 2015 to all clients in which [Unregistered IA 9] was named an authorized party. ; [Unregistered IA 9] will be removed on October 14, 2015 as Trading Authority on all of their Fidelity accounts. Risk Management DOES not speak directly with customers. DO NOT transfer or give the customer our phone number.
- Unregistered I A 1 0 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- As of April 23, 2008, Fidelity's notes show that Fidelity was aware that Unregistered IA 10 was conducting investment advisory business :
talked with client per request of [Fidelity employee], client in 4 1 2 book. [Unregistered IA 1 OJ is responsible for a number of accts/relationships at Fideility [sic] and actively manages and trades those accts. [Unregistered IA 9] mentioned he speaks with [Fidelity employee] frequently.
- Fidelity' s August 11, 2015 notes indicate that Unregistered IA 10 managed at least $2 1,000,000 of assets in Fidelity customer accounts: "[Unregistered IA 1 OJ called rep verified. He was reporting some problems with the website. He's authorized on multiple family accounts, he's created custom groups for those accounts. Normally the All Accounts value adds up to $2 1 million. []This morning it kept adding up to $39 million. . . "
- Fidelity's September 18, 2015 notes further clarify that Unregistered IA 10 managed accounts for not only family, but for friends as well: "Client manages assets for friends and family, provided my number if any planning or consolidation needs arise. Client is concerned about the volatility currently."
- In response to a Division subpoena, Fidelity indicates that on September 17, 20 1 5, it informed Unregistered IA 10 that his trading authority would be revoked.
- Unregistered I A 11 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- Fidelity' s notes regarding Unregistered IA 1 1 show that he had trading authority on Fidelity customer accounts dating back to at least February 2007.
- In response to a Division subpoena, Fidelity indicated that on September 17, 2015, it informed Unregistered IA 1 1 that his trading authority would be revoked.
- Unregistered IA 12 was never registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- Fidelity's notes regarding Unregistered IA 12 show that her advisory activity over
Fidelity customer accounts dates back to at least October 2006. Specifically, an October 23,
2006 Fidelity note states :
this client is a CFA who trades a 72- 1 00 times a yr across many accts at Fidelity-she has referred millions to me--and will continue--she has a very small acct at Fidelity--she wants the ability to use ATP on the accts that she has trade authority on--is this possible? If so, can you help her establish so she can use the platform while trading o n accts where she is authorized? thanks--FYI please keep me in the loop--she plans to refer her mom and dad close to $ 5 mm from another broker sometime in the next yr as well as another $ I mm new household.
- Over nine years later, Fidelity's April 15, 2015 notes demonstrate that Unregistered IA 12 was still acting as an adviser, stating in part: "[s]he is a money manager and has been self directed in the past. not working with as many clients any more. "
- Fidelity' s notes reflect that o n September 17, 2015 a Fidelity employee reached out to Unregistered IA 12 to discuss Fidelity' s advisor platform. , stating: "left message for [Unregistered IA 12] about chnages [sic] to how advisors can work[]with clients[]on platform."
- I n response t o a Division subpoena, Fidelity indicated on September 17, 2015 Unregistered IA 12 was informed that her trading authority would be revoked.
- Upon information and belief, no Massachusetts resident going by [Unregistered IA 13] as having ever registered with the Division as an investment adviser or investment adviser representative during the Relevant Time Period.
- In response t o a Division subpoena, Fidelity indicated that it could not inform Unregistered IA 13 that his trading authority would be revoked.
- Section 204 of the Act provides:
- (B) has willfully violated or willfully failed to comply with any provision of this chapter or a predecessor chapter or any rule or order under this chapter or a predecessor chapter;
- (G) has engaged in any unethical or dishonest conduct or practices m the securities, commodities or insurance business;
(a)The secretary may by order impose an administrative fine or censure or deny, suspend, or revoke any registration or take any other appropriate action if he finds (1) that the order is in the public interest and (2) that the applicant or registrant or, in the case of a broker-dealer or investment adviser, any partner, officer, or director, any person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions, or any person directly or indirectly controlling the broker-dealer or investment adviser:
MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 110A, § 204 .
12.204: Denial, Revocation, Suspension, Cancellation and Withdrawal of Registration (1) Dishonest and Unethical Practices in the Securities Business. (a) Broker-dealers. Each broker-dealer shall observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in the conduct of its business. Acts and practices, including, but not limited to the following, are considered contrary to such standards and constitute dishonest or unethical practices which are grounds for imposition of an administrative fine, censure, denial, suspension or revocation of a registration, or such other appropriate action . . . :
- The RICE Section realleges and incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 182 above.
- The conduct of Respondent, as described above, constitutes a violation of MASS. GEN. LAws ch. 110A, § 204.
▲Top of page
IV. Relevant Time Period
▲Top of page
V. Respondents
▲Top of page
VI. Other Relevant Entity and Individual
▲Top of page
VII. Statement of Facts
Fidelity's Trading Authorization Policies and Procedures
(emphasis in original).
(emphasis in original).
RED FLAGS
Fidelity Permitted Unregistered Investment Adviser Activity for at Least Ten Years
Unregistered IA 1, Acct 1 |
Unregistered IA 1, Acct 2 |
Unregistered IA 1, Acct 3 |
Unregistered IA 1, Acct 4 |
Unregistered IA 1, Acct 5 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades |
2005 | 456 | 2005 | 341 | ||||||
2006 | 1,051 | 2006 | 11 | 2006 | 28 | ||||
2007 | 949 | 2007 | 19 | ||||||
2008 | 988 | ||||||||
2009 | 573 | ||||||||
2010 | 1257 | ||||||||
2011 | 173 | 2011 | 981 | ||||||
2012 | 172 | 2012 | 1092 | 2012 | 171 | ||||
2013 | 983 | 2013 | 494 | ||||||
2014 | 1078 | 2014 | 592 | ||||||
2015 | 860 | 2015 | 120 | ||||||
TOTAL | 345 | 10,268 | 352 | 47 | 1377 | ||||
Grand Total All Accounts All Year = 12,389 |
[Unregistered IA 1] acts as an advisor for several other [Fidelity] clients. he inquired if his clients could pay him directly out of their retirement accts and not be coded as a dist[ribution]. confirmed with clients services this can be done. his clients have to send us a [letter of instruction] stating the [transfer] of their cash to his [Fidelity] acct is for an ADVISOR FEE every time they want this to occur. he understands that the burden of proof is on the him [sic] and his clients if the IRS investigates. he agreed it would be beneficial to discuss with the IRS and a tax attorney initially. he is going to inform clients to mail requests to burl branch private access.
(emphasis in original).
spoke to [Unregistered IA 1] - told him that if he's not an [registered investment adviser] officially and just the trading authority on accounts, we cannot admit them into the [private access] model - svc would suffer. if the particular acct turns out to be atp, then that acct will get the 8 dollar trades. encouraged him to get the series 66 and hang up his shingle officially as an ria to group the accounts he manages as more of an advisor relationship. will ask [Fidelity employee] to speak with him as to how that would work.
(emphasis added).
.. . he's trying to use [private access] as an ria - calls the team to service the non pa accounts so he's getting pa service. I suggested he get his 66 adn [sic] e and o insurance - even had [Fidelity employee] call him to discuss advisor platform. he's been given 40 free trades already and team has had to manually keep track of their usage since they go thru several accounts that he has [trading authority] on.
(emphasis added).
.. . he's trying to use [private access] as an ria - calls the team to service the non pa accounts so he's getting pa service. I suggested he get his 66 adn [sic] e and o insurance - even had [Fidelity employee] call him to discuss advisor platform. he's been given 40 free trades already and team has had to manually keep track of their usage since they go thru several accounts that he has [trading authority] on.
(emphasis added).
Call with [Unregistered IA 1] to talk about how he wants to do business. he is a CFA. MBA in finance and former investment banker. he is self employeed [sic] and manages money for a few clients. he wants them to have PA access. He will trade online and we will help service the clients when needed. He asked about promotions and I directed to the current promo allowed and showed him how to 12 register online for the free $100. He doesn't follow asset allocation for his or clients. he is a value investor that buys stocks.
(emphasis added).
client called upset that [Lucent] orders were not being filled. The orders were limit orders and were filling slower that [sic] he thought they should. Also the orders in his account were being filled before the orders in some of the other accounts he has [trading authority] on and they were placed first. I offered to call the desk but he wanted to be trasnferred [sic] to Active Trader. Transferred as requested.
ATP - Client has trade authorization over a few accounts with us. He was going in today to place the same buy order in all 5 accounts and was disappointed to learn that he needs to type out each order. He would like to see us offer a way to place the same order in multiple accounts with just filling out I trade ticket. thanks
(Emphasis Added).
(Emphasis in original) .
Unregistered IA 1 's Clients
Client 1
Client 1, Acct. 1 | Client 1, Acct. 2 | Client 1, Acct. 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades |
2005 | none | 2005 | none | 2005 | 127 |
2006 | 259 | 2006 | 29 | 2006 | 67 |
2007 | 287 | 2007 | 29 | 2007 | 151 |
2008 | 279 | 2008 | 33 | 2008 | 115 |
2009 | 285 | 2009 | 26 | 2009 | 163 |
2010 | 503 | 2010 | 52 | 2010 | 109 |
2011 | 700 | 2011 | 32 | 2011 | 83 |
2012 | 671 | 2012 | 154 | 2012 | 3 |
2013 | 1,344 | 2013 | 2 | 2013 | 8 |
2014 | 1,106 | 2014 | 32 | 2014 | 14 |
2015 | 656 | 2015 | 2015 | ||
TOTAL | 6,090 | 389 | 840 | ||
Grand Total All Accounts All Year = 7,319 |
1 Fidelity did not provide the Division with documents or trade information for one of the three accounts on Client l's August 2005 trading authorization fonn.
Client 2
Client 2, Acct. 1 | Client 2, Acct. 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades |
2005 | 34 | 2005 | 4 |
2006 | 262 | 2006 | |
2007 | 244 | 2007 | 1 |
2008 | 278 | 2008 | |
2009 | 193 | 2009 | |
2010 | 399 | 2010 | 23 |
2011 | 278 | 2011 | 217 |
2012 | 459 | 2012 | 318 |
2013 | 739 | 2013 | 308 |
2014 | 669 | 2014 | 239 |
2015 | 288 | 2015 | 43 |
TOTAL | 3843 | TOTAL | 1153 |
Grand Total All Accounts All Year = 4996 |
Client 3
Client 3, Acct. 1 | Client 3, Acct. 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades |
2006 | 2 | ||
2007 | 9 | 1 | |
2008 | 11 | 2008 | 5 |
2009 | 11 | 2009 | 6 |
TOTAL | 33 | TOTAL | 6 |
Grand Total All Accounts All Years = 39 |
Client 4
Client 4, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2006 | 314 |
2007 | 129 |
2008 | 114 |
2009 | 91 |
2010 | 226 |
2011 | 161 |
2012 | 297 |
2013 | 329 |
2014 | 443 |
2015 | 276 |
TOTAL | 2380 |
Client 5
Client 5, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2006 | 138 |
2007 | 134 |
2008 | 126 |
2009 | 87 |
2010 | 138 |
2011 | 128 |
2012 | 194 |
2013 | 397 |
2014 | 377 |
2015 | 328 |
TOTAL | 2047 |
Client 6
Client 6, Acct. 1 | Client 6, Acct. 2 | Client 6, Acct. 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades |
2006 | 2 | 2006 | 73 | 2006 | 10 |
2007 | 141 | 2007 | 3 | ||
2008 | 118 | 2008 | |||
2009 | 108 | 2009 | |||
2010 | 222 | 2010 | 2 | ||
2011 | 158 | 2011 | 15 | ||
2012 | 267 | 2012 | |||
2013 | 323 | 2013 | 16 | ||
2014 | 326 | 2014 | |||
2015 | 266 | 2015 | |||
TOTAL | 2 | 2022 | 46 | ||
Grand Total All Accounts All Year = 2,050 |
Client 7
Client 7, Acct. 1 | Client 7, Acct. 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades |
2006 | 170 | 2006 | |
2007 | 169 | 2007 | |
2008 | 90 | 2008 | |
2009 | 91 | 2009 | |
2010 | 178 | 2010 | |
2011 | 169 | 2011 | |
2012 | 175 | 2012 | |
2013 | 294 | 2013 | |
2014 | 321 | 2014 | 87 |
2015 | 113 | 2015 | 103 |
TOTAL | 1770 | TOTAL | 190 |
Grand Total All Accounts All Year = 1960 |
Client 8
Client 8, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2010 | 65 |
2011 | 85 |
2012 | 74 |
2013 | 148 |
2014 | 94 |
2015 | 46 |
TOTAL | 512 |
Client 9
Client 9, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2010 | 130 |
2011 | 79 |
2012 | 88 |
2013 | 249 |
2014 | 380 |
2015 | 322 |
TOTAL | 1,248 |
Client 10
Client 10, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2011 | 32 |
2012 | 13 |
2013 | 22 |
2014 | 12 |
2015 | 11 |
TOTAL | 90 |
Client 11
Client 11, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2013 | 23 |
2014 | 42 |
2015 | 41 |
TOTAL | 106 |
Client 12
Client 12, Acct. 1 | Client 12, Acct. 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades |
2013 | 2013 | 108 | |
2014 | 48 | 2014 | 51 |
2015 | 27 | 2015 | 10 |
TOTAL | 75 | TOTAL | 169 |
Grand Total All Accounts All Years = 244 |
Client 13
Client 13, Acct. 1 | Client 13, Acct. 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of Trades | Year | Number of Trades |
2006 | 345 | ||
2007 | 320 | ||
2008 | 204 | ||
2009 | 141 | ||
2010 | 345 | ||
2011 | 233 | ||
2012 | 439 | ||
2013 | 615 | 2013 | 74 |
2014 | 643 | 2014 | 134 |
2015 | 347 | 2015 | 254 |
TOTAL | 3632 | TOTAL | 462 |
Grand Total All Accounts All Years = 4,094 |
Client 14
Client 14, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2013 | 18 |
2014 | 202 |
2015 | 125 |
TOTAL | 345 |
Client 15
Client 15, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2014 | 248 |
2015 | 54 |
TOTAL | 302 |
Client 16
Client 16, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2014 | 64 |
2015 | 19 |
TOTAL | 83 |
Client 17
Client 17, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2014 | 25 |
2015 | 25 |
TOTAL | 50 |
Client 18
Client 18, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2014 | 196 |
2015 | 90 |
TOTAL | 286 |
Client 19
Client 19, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2014 | 79 |
2015 | 101 |
TOTAL | 180 |
Client 20
Client 20, Acct. 1 | |
---|---|
Year | Number of Trades |
2014 | 38 |
2015 | 165 |
TOTAL | 203 |
Client 21
Client 22
Fidelity's trade blotter identifies 119 trades made in the Fidelity customer account in which Client 22 gave Unregistered IA 1 trading authority in 2015 .
2 The Division has removed names and contact information provided by Fidelity from the spreadsheet.
Name (redacted) |
City |
State |
# of Retail Accountants Trading Authority on |
#of Retail Accounts TA Revoked (or pending/ |
Date of Communication |
Reason for Revoking |
Reason for Not Revoked |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unregistered IA 2 |
Lincoln |
MA |
3 |
1 |
1/20/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
Authorization on spouse's accounts were |
Unregistered IA 3 |
Truro |
MA |
43 |
43 |
3/30/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
na |
Unregistered IA 4 |
Carlisle |
MA |
59 |
57 |
6/2/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
Authorization on spouse's accounts were not revoked. |
Unregistered IA 5 |
Somerville |
MA |
99 |
92 |
6/2/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
Authorization on spouse's accounts were not revoked. |
Unregistered IA 6 |
Winchester |
MA |
30 |
27 |
6/8/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
Authorization on spouse's accounts were not revoked. |
Unregistered IA 7 |
Millis |
MA |
16 |
16 |
7/27/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
n/a |
Unregistered IA 8 |
Stockbridge |
MA |
24 |
22 |
7/28/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
Authorization on spouse's accounts were not revoked. |
Unregistered IA 9 |
Pittsfield |
MA |
16 |
16 |
9/14/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
n/a |
Unregistered IA 10 |
Chestnut Hill |
MA |
27 |
23 |
9/17/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
Authorization on spouse's accounts were not revoked. |
Unregistered IA 11 |
Reading |
MA |
17 |
16 |
9/17/2015 |
Terminated for not being registered |
Authorization on spouse's accounts were not revoked. |
Unregistered IA 12 |
Wellesley Hills |
MA |
18 |
18 |
9/17/2015 |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
n/a |
Unregistered IA 13 |
n/a |
MA |
4 |
4 |
Not sent a notification letter as we do not have an address on file for him and he does not have any personal accounts. He will be removed from accounts and customers will be notified. |
Terminated due to lack of registration |
n/a |
Unregistered IA 2
(emphasis in original).
Unregistered IA 3
(Emphasis in original).
(emphasis in original).
Unregistered IA 5
(emphasis in original).
Unregistered IA 6
(emphasis added) .
Unregistered IA 7
(emphasis in original).
Unregistered IA 8
(emphasis in original).
Unregistered IA 9
(emphasis in original).
Unregistered IA 10
Unregistered IA 11
Unregistered IA 12
(emphasis added) .
Unregistered IA 13
▲Top of page
VIII. Violations of Law
A. Violation of MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 110A, § 204
950 Mass. Code Regs. 1 2 .204 (emphasis added) .
▲Top of page
IX. Statutory Basis For Relief
Section 407A of the Act provides, in pertinent part:
(a) If the secretary determines, after notice and opportunity for hearing, that any person has engaged in or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision of this chapter or any rule or order issued thereunder, he may order such person to cease and desist from such unlawful act or practice and may take such affirmative action, including the imposition of an administrative fine, the issuance of an order for an accounting, disgorgement or rescission or any other such relief as in his j udgment may be necessary to carry out the purposes of [the Act] .
MASS. GEN. LAws ch. 1 1 OA, § 407A.
▲Top of page
X. Public Interest
For any and all of the reasons set forth above, it is in the public interest and will protect Massachusetts investors for the Director to enter an order finding that such "action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors and consistent with the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of this chapter [MASS. GEN. LAws ch. 110A] ."
▲Top of page
XI. Relief Requested
The RICE Section of the Division requests that an order be entered:
- Finding as fact all allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 182, inclusive of the Complaint;
- Finding that all the sanctions and remedies detailed herein are in the public interest and necessary for the protection of Massachusetts investors;
- Censuring Respondent;
- Requiring Respondent to permanently cease and desist from further dishonest and unethical conduct that allowed unregistered investment advisers to utilize the Fidelity trading platform to conduct unregistered investment advisory activity in the Commonwealth and to be compensated from Fidelity customer accounts for providing unregistered investment advisory services;
- Requiring Respondent to engage an independent compliance consultant to review written policies and procedures regarding trading authorizations and ensuring that such policies include methods for enforcement and compliance oversight;
- Finding that all sanctions and remedies detailed herein are in the public interest and necessary for the protection of Massachusetts investors;
- Imposing an administrative fine on Respondent for each violation of the Act; and
- Taking any such further actions which may be necessary or appropriate in the public interest for the protection of Massachusetts investors.
Dated: October 26, 2015
Massachusetts Securities Division
RICE Section
By its attorneys,
