Skip to main content
Massachusetts State Seal
Commonwealth Museum   Secretary of the Commonwealth William Francis Galvin

Australian Rules – The Secret Ballot

In 1856, Australia introduced innovative election laws to ensure privacy in voting. Later in the century, machines would help tabulate the vote.


A vintage drawing of men voting and one seems upset.

Polling booths and the secret ballot.

A First for Massachusetts In 1888, Massachusetts passed “An Act to Provide for Printing and Distributing Ballots,” an Australian type election law that became a model for other states. (Some called it the “Massachusetts Ballot.”) The state would now print ballots, provide booths to protect the privacy of voters, and bar politicking within the polling place.


An aged document with signatures on it

Pre-printed petitions for the Australian ballot


Two historical documents side by side

An Act to Provide for Printing and Distributing Ballots.

A View from the Top
Former Massachusetts Governor Oliver Ames favored the printed secret ballot to discourage illiterate voters. It would bring “good manners” to the voting place and provide “the best test of the reading and writing qualification…that has ever been had.”

Voting by Machine
An early version of punch card machines was introduced in 1889. The first mechanical lever voting machine appeared a few months later. Massachusetts discontinued the use of punch card machines in 1997, three years before the issue of “hanging chads” clouded results in Florida’s 2000 Presidential election. Concerns about possible hacking – including interference by foreign governments have dampened enthusiasm for potential online voting. A paper ballot, which can be scanned by machine and recounted by hand if necessary, is more secure.

The voting machine used by Eleanor Roosevelt was mechanical, not electric. While there was no controversy, a broken “tooth” on a gear inside the machine could produce an inaccurate count.
The voting machine used by Eleanor Roosevelt was mechanical, not electric. While there was no controversy, a broken “tooth” on a gear inside the machine could produce an inaccurate count. 
  - FDR Library photo, National Park Service

Vintage ads for voting machines and equipment.

Massachusetts Archives